Case 1804378/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Koleszko v 1616 Media Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1804378/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Koleszko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment issued by Employment Judge JM Wade on 5 January 2024. The claimant, Mrs M Koleszko, succeeded on three complaints: entitlement to a redundancy payment, unlawful deductions from April's pay, and unpaid holiday pay on termination of employment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent, 1616 Media Limited, to pay gross sums of £1,832.85 for redundancy pay, £1,765 for unlawful deductions in April's pay, and £395.90 for holiday pay. The total gross sum payable under the judgment was £3,993.40, with the note that the claimant would account to HMRC for any tax or national insurance due, if any.
The judgment also recorded that the dispute concerning £1,765 in respect of both notice pay and May's pay, and any appropriate sum to be deducted on account of sums already paid or capital, was to be resolved at a future hearing unless the parties agreed otherwise. That issue was therefore not finally determined in this consent judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Consent judgment: the claimant's complaint of entitlement to a redundancy payment succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,832.85. | Upheld | — | £1,833 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment: the claimant's complaint concerning unlawful deductions in April's pay succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,765. | Upheld | — | £1,765 |
| Holiday pay | Consent judgment: the claimant's complaint of unpaid holiday pay on termination of employment succeeded and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £395.90. | Upheld | — | £396 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,993
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.