Case 1804404/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Lowe v Clarico Payroll Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804404/2021
- Decision date
- 2 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Lowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 2 September 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Bright determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the papers, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £540 gross. It also found that notice pay had not been paid and ordered £180 gross, together with a further £30 for other financial losses incurred.
The tribunal further found that the claimant’s holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £880 gross. The statutory redundancy payment claim was struck out because the claimant had not worked for the respondent for two years or more. The total amount ordered was £1,630.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered £540 gross. | Upheld | — | £540 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay notice pay and awarded £180 gross, plus a further £30 for other financial losses incurred. | Upheld | — | £210 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £880 gross. | Upheld | — | £880 |
| Redundancy | The statutory redundancy payment claim was struck out because the claimant had not worked for the respondent for two years or more. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,630
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.