Case 1804410/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Y Wigley v Texplan Manufacturing Limited (in Administration) CONSENT — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804410/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Y Wigley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment in which Ms H Y Wigley’s employment with Texplan Manufacturing Limited (in Administration) was recorded as having ended by redundancy on 31 March 2020. The judgment records that the claimant raised a complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 seeking a protective award for failure to consult in accordance with section 188A.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant was assigned to an establishment where 20 or more redundancies were proposed within a period of 90 days, and that the respondent did not fully inform and consult with her in accordance with section 188A. It therefore made a protective award in the claimant’s favour for a protected period of 56 days beginning on 31 March 2020, with payment capped at the amount payable by the Redundancy Payments Service.
The judgment states that the amounts are payable by the RPS to the extent permitted by its regulations and limits, with any shortfall ranking as an ordinary unsecured claim in the administration. It also records that there was no order for costs or fees, and that the claimant’s claim was extinguished in its entirety by the consent judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under s.189 TULRCA 1992 for failure to inform and consult under s.188A. The tribunal made a protective award for a 56-day protected period beginning on 31 March 2020, capped at the amount payable by the RPS. No monetary figure is stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.189 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- Regulation 5(2)(b) of the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.