Case 1804411/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Booth v York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804411/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr C Childs, Ms J Rathbone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Booth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Booth brought disability discrimination claims against York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The case was heard by video link in Leeds on 12, 13 and 14 April 2021 before Employment Judge Shepherd sitting with lay members Mr C Childs and Ms J Rathbone.
The tribunal's unanimous judgment was that the claims of disability discrimination were not well founded and were dismissed. The written record does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning, and it notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing.
No monetary remedy was awarded and the judgment records no separate compensation figures. The decision also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claims of disability discrimination were not well founded and were dismissed. It does not set out separate heads of claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.