Case 1804420/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Thompson v Lisa At Lotties Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804420/2021
- Decision date
- 10 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Thompson brought a claim against Lisa At Lotties Ltd for unauthorised deduction from wages. At the hearing in Leeds by CVP on 4 November 2021, before Employment Judge Tegerdine, the tribunal found the claim well founded.
The tribunal held that the respondent should pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,030.50. This was identified as the amount properly payable in respect of 158 hours of accrued but untaken holiday pay owed to the claimant for the period between 26 August 2020 and 3 August 2021.
The tribunal ordered payment on or before 18 November 2021. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described the claim as one for unauthorised deduction from wages and found it well founded. The award was the gross sum of £1,030.50 for 158 hours of accrued but untaken holiday pay owed for the period 26 August 2020 to 3 August 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,031 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,031
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.