Case 1804443/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Neasden Pre-School & Extended School Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804443/2019
- Decision date
- 17 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Hull on 12 December 2019 before Employment Judge Rogerson. The respondent entered no response. The judgment records two separate conclusions arising from the claimant's dismissal.
First, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £800.00. Second, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,160.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £800.00. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,160.00. | Upheld | — | £2,160 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,960
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.