Case 1804443/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Hoggard v EEV management Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804443/2022
- Decision date
- 13 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Hoggard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 1 September 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
EEV Management Ltd was added as the respondent in substitution of EEV Management under rule 34. The Tribunal declared that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,350.00.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment declares that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and orders payment of a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £2,350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,350
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 34
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.