Case 1804455/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Serioza v The Harrogate Dry Cleaning Company Limited t/a Sunbrite — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804455/2019
- Decision date
- 22 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Licorish Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Serioza
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment heard in Leeds on 22 October 2019 before Employment Judge Licorish. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal substituted the correct respondent name, The Harrogate Dry Cleaning Company Limited t/a Sunbrite, and recorded that the claim form had been validly served on the respondent’s registered office at Companies House.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered payment of £1,263.96 in total, comprising £1,039.96 net wages due under the payslip dated 25 May 2019, £160 for 20 hours worked on 21, 25 and 28 May 2019, and £64 for wages due for the bank holiday on 27 May 2019.
The tribunal also found that, when proceedings were begun, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of terms and conditions under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It ordered a further £960 gross as additional compensation, calculated by reference to a 30-hour week.
The claimant was made responsible for any additional income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the gross amounts ordered. The overall monetary outcome recorded in the judgment was £2,223.96.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,263.96, made up of £1,039.96 net wages due on the payslip dated 25 May 2019, £160 for 20 hours worked on 21, 25 and 28 May 2019, and £64 for bank holiday pay on 27 May 2019. | Upheld | — | £1,264 |
| Other | The tribunal found that, when proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of terms and conditions under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered a further 4 weeks' pay of £960 gross, calculated on a 30-hour week. | Upheld | — | £960 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,224
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £960
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.