Case 1804456/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Smith v R1: Bestcare UK Ltd R2: Howard Emanuel — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804456/2019
- Decision date
- 31 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 16 December 2019, the Tribunal gave Mrs L Smith an opportunity to make written representations, or request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 24 October 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mrs L Smith did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 22 to 26 June 2020 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 24 October 2019 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 strike out
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.