Case 1804456/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Sala v Lowell Group Shared Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804456/2022
- Decision date
- 5 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Sala
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 2 November 2022, Employment Judge Maidment ordered the claimant, Miss K Sala, to pay a deposit of £300 in total, split as £150 for each complaint. The order was sent to the claimant on the same day.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to pay the deposit. As a result, the tribunal struck out the complaints of direct sex discrimination and direct race discrimination under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The hearing listed for 10 to 11 May 2023 did not proceed because the claims had been struck out. No substantive findings on liability or monetary remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal struck out the direct sex discrimination complaint because the claimant failed to pay the £150 deposit ordered at the preliminary hearing on 2 November 2022. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal struck out the direct race discrimination complaint because the claimant failed to pay the £150 deposit ordered at the preliminary hearing on 2 November 2022. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.