Case 1804467/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wilkinson, lay representative For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804467/2022
- Decision date
- 10 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James
- Venue
- Sheffield
- Panel members
- Mr K Smith, Mrs J Lee
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr A Wilkinson, lay representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Sheffield on 25 and 26 September 2023 before Employment Judge A James, sitting with Mr K Smith and Mrs J Lee. The claimant was represented by Mr A Wilkinson and the respondent by Mr N Bidnell-Edwards, counsel.
The judgment records a single claim for disability related harassment under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal held that the claim was not upheld and dismissed it.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made at the hearing or submitted in writing within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for disability related harassment under s.26 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found it was not upheld and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.