Case 1804512/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. R Lowdon v Mach Recruitment Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804512/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. R Lowdon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of race discrimination and disability discrimination. The respondent did not file a response, and neither party attended the final hearing listed by CVP on 7 November 2022.
The tribunal found that the claims appeared to be out of time because the events appeared to have taken place in December 2021, while the claim form was filed on 25 August 2022. The claim form gave no explanation for why the claims had not been made earlier, and the tribunal had received no contact from the claimant or his representative after the claim was filed.
The tribunal recorded that efforts to contact the claimant's representative by email and telephone were unsuccessful, and that the claimant and representative did not appear. Taking account of the apparent time issue, the lack of information supporting a just and equitable extension of time, the absence of contact, and the unclear basis for the disability discrimination claim, the tribunal determined that it was in the interests of justice to dismiss all claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination claim was dismissed. The tribunal noted the claim appeared out of time, there was no explanation for delay, the claimant did not attend the hearing, and no contact had been received from the claimant or representative after the claim was filed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination claim was dismissed. The tribunal noted the claim appeared out of time, there was no explanation for delay, no attendance at the hearing, no contact after filing, and that the basis for the disability discrimination claim was unclear. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- just and equitable to extend time
- overriding objective
- interests of justice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.