Case 1804541/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs RE Bamfield v The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police AT A HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804541/2019
- Decision date
- 27 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr W Roberts, Mr M Brewer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs RE Bamfield
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Leeds on 26 and 27 February 2020 before Employment Judge Lancaster, sitting with lay members Mr W Roberts and Mr M Brewer. The claimant, Mrs RE Bamfield, was represented by Mr C Stockdale, solicitor, and the respondent, Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, was represented by Miss O Checa-Dover, counsel.
The judgment records that the claims of unfair dismissal and failure to make reasonable adjustments were dismissed. The extracted text does not include the tribunal's detailed reasons, findings of fact, or any remedy award, so the record only supports the formal outcomes of the two claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was a failure to make reasonable adjustments; it does not set out further reasoning in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.