Case 1804543/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Trident Bathrooms (Yorkshire) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804543/2019
- Decision date
- 31 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Appearance
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 31 October 2019 before Employment Judge Wedderspoon. The Respondent did not attend. The judgment records that Mr Ahmed’s claims for unlawful deductions, holiday pay and notice pay succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent, Trident Bathrooms (Yorkshire) Limited, to pay the Claimant £2,644.25 by 4 p.m. on 14 November 2019. No further breakdown of the sum was set out in the judgment, and no separate findings or legal tests were recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the Claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions succeeded; the award was not split between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the Claimant’s claim for holiday pay succeeded; the award was not split between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to 'notice pay' succeeding. This has been mapped to breach of contract because no separate legal label is given in the text. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,644
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.