Case 1804575/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v SAYO Recruitment Ltd and Panel UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804575/2023
- Decision date
- 4 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in public by CVP in Sheffield on 1 December 2023 before Employment Judge Rostant, with the claimant appearing in person and counsel appearing for both respondents. The extracted judgment records that the claimant was Mr J Sivak, the respondents were SAYO Recruitment Limited and Panel UK Ltd.
The only substantive order in the extract is that all claims against the first respondent, SAYO Recruitment Limited, were struck out. The extracted text does not state the underlying claim types, the reasons for strike out, or any separate determination in relation to the second respondent.
No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that all claims against the first respondent, SAYO Recruitment Limited, are struck out. The underlying claim types are not identified in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.