Case 1804577/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Ibbotson v Wcs Environmental Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804577/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Ibbotson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T Ibbotson's claim against WCS Environmental Ltd was heard at Leeds on 20 November 2019 before Employment Judge JM Wade. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by its HR Manager, Mrs L Landsall. The judgment records a single successful complaint described as an unlawful deduction from wages/breach of contract concerning £1,500 commission.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of an unlawful deduction from wages/breach of contract in respect of £1500 commission succeeds; the award was not split between the two legal bases. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of an unlawful deduction from wages/breach of contract in respect of £1500 commission succeeds; the award was not split between the two legal bases. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.