Case 1804583/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Ward v AS Training Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804583/2019
- Decision date
- 3 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Hull on 3 January 2020, Employment Judge D N Jones heard the case with Mr C Ward appearing in person and the respondent not attending. The tribunal found that As Training Services Limited breached the claimant’s contract of employment by failing to pay one week’s notice pay and a car allowance of £200 per month for the period October 2018 to August 2019 inclusive.
For that breach of contract claim, the tribunal ordered damages of £403.85 for notice pay and £2,200 for car allowance. It also found that there had been an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s August 2019 salary and ordered the respondent to pay £1,750 in respect of that deduction.
The judgment also recorded that if the claimant wished to pursue a claim for pension losses, he was required to file and serve evidence of loss and quantification by 14 February 2020. On the sums actually awarded in the judgment, the total monetary amount ordered was £4,353.85.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the contract by failing to pay one week’s notice pay and a car allowance of £200 per month from October 2018 to August 2019 inclusive. It awarded £403.85 for notice pay and £2,200 for car allowance. | Upheld | — | £2,604 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s salary for August 2019 and ordered payment of £1,750. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,354
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.