Case 1804587/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Broadhead v Rachel Dawson and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1804587/2023
- Decision date
- 20 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss H Broadhead
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 August 2024, the tribunal told Miss H Broadhead that her unfair dismissal claim might be struck out because she did not appear to have the continuity of service needed to bring such a complaint under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. She was given the opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on that issue.
The claimant did not show cause why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Brain struck out the unfair dismissal claim on 20 August 2024. The judgment records no determination of the merits of the dismissal complaint and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have the continuity of service required to bring the complaint under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing but did not show cause or ask for a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.