Case 1804592/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Wayne Allan & Others v AL Realisations Limited (in Administration), and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804592/2020
- Decision date
- 22 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Wayne Allan & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment covering the claimants listed in the attached schedule, including Mr Wayne Allan. The judgment records that the claimants were employed by the first and second respondents, that the second respondent changed its name to the first respondent on 22 April 2020, and that administrators were appointed in March and April 2020.
The judgment states that between 31 March and 22 May 2020 the claimants were dismissed by reason of redundancy. The claimants brought a complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 seeking a protective award for failure to consult in accordance with sections 188 and 188A. The parties accepted that the claimants were assigned to an establishment where 20 or more redundancies were proposed within a 90-day period, and that the respondents did not fully inform and consult with them as required.
The Tribunal made a protective award in favour of the claimants listed in the schedule for a protected period of 10 days, beginning on each claimant's termination date as set out in the schedule. The award was capped at the amount payable by the Redundancy Payments Service, subject to any deductions required by law. The judgment also records that each party was to bear its own costs and fees, and that the claims listed in the schedule were extinguished in their entirety by the consent judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under sections 188, 188A and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment is by consent and makes a protective award for a 10-day protected period, capped at the amount payable by the Redundancy Payments Service and subject to deductions required by law; no monetary sum is stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.