Case 1804593/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Miscikaityte v Coco Cereal Café Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804593/2019
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Miscikaityte
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M Miscikaityte brought claims against Coco Cereal Cafe Ltd for unauthorised deduction from wages, notice pay, holiday pay, and failure to provide a written pay statement. The respondent did not present a response after notice of the claim was sent on 5 September 2019.
This was a Rule 21 judgment. On the information before Employment Judge Shepherd Date, the tribunal held that the claims succeeded. The judgment records that the claims of unauthorised deduction from wages, notice pay, holiday pay and failure to provide a written pay statement all succeeded.
No remedy was assessed in the liability judgment. The tribunal directed that the remedy for those successful claims would be determined at a Remedy Hearing, and converted the hearing listed for 31 October 2019 into a Remedy Hearing at the same time and venue.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for notice pay succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the holiday pay claim succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claim for failure to provide a written pay statement succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.