Case 1804628/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Tabassum v White Rose Homecare Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1804628/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Singh Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Tabassum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn Ms M Tabassum’s case against White Rose Homecare Limited, heard at Leeds Employment Tribunal from 2 to 6 June 2025 before Employment Judge Singh, the written record states the outcomes but not the tribunal’s full reasons. The claimant succeeded in her unfair dismissal claim and in her victimisation claim in relation to the dismissal. Her claim for automatic unfair dismissal on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity leave was dismissed, as were her claims for unfavourable treatment on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity, direct pregnancy discrimination, other victimisation claims, and failure to provide a written statement of particulars.
The remedy section records a single aggregate award rather than an apportionment between the successful claims. The respondent was ordered to pay £12,636.00 for past financial losses, £1,146.59 interest on that amount, £15,000.00 for injury to feelings, a 15% uplift on injury to feelings of £2,250.00 for failure to follow the ACAS code of practice, and £1,565.26 interest on injury to feelings. The total award therefore comes to £32,597.85. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Ordinary unfair dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity leave. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Unfavourable treatment on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Direct pregnancy discrimination. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation in relation to the dismissal. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Victimisation | Other victimisation claims. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of particulars. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £32,598
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £12,636
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.