Case 1804641/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Parry v Polaris Apparel Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804641/2023
- Decision date
- 26 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Parry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 16 August 2023. The respondent, Polaris Apparel Limited, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge proceeded to determine the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 13 October 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that Miss L Parry had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that she was entitled to a redundancy payment. The judgment records the amount of that payment as £10,192.43. No other claims, findings, or separate remedy components are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that Miss L Parry was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £10,192.43. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the tribunal made a rule 21 determination. | Upheld | — | £10,192 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,192
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.