Case 1804643/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Ferber (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804643/2020
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms I Ferber (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds before Employment Judge JM Wade, recorded that Mr C Smith's complaints of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages were well founded and succeeded. The judgment awarded damages for wrongful dismissal of £4,748.04 and unlawful deductions from wages of £490.37.
On the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £3,228.00 and a compensatory award of £42,584.00. The total judgment sum was £51,050.41.
The judgment also states that the recoupment regulations apply. It records a prescribed period of 25 June 2020 to 11 February 2021, a prescribed amount of £23,848, and an excess over that amount of £27,202.41.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award £3,228.00 and compensatory award £42,584.00. | Upheld | — | £45,812 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Damages for wrongful dismissal awarded in the sum of £4,748.04. | Upheld | — | £4,748 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deductions from wages awarded in the sum of £490.37. | Upheld | — | £490 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £51,050
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,228
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £42,584
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.