Case 1804648/2020 · Employment Tribunal
no attendance For the v Mr J. Roddy (paralegal) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804648/2020
- Decision date
- 18 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
no attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 18 March 2021 before Employment Judge Rogerson. The claimant did not attend; the respondent was represented by Mr J. Roddy, a paralegal. The written judgment states that, in accordance with rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure, the claim was dismissed.
The written record says reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the decision. No separate liability findings, jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction analysis, or monetary award are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment records only that the claim was dismissed under rule 47; it does not set out separate breach of contract findings or any award. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment records only that the claim was dismissed under rule 47; it does not set out separate working time findings or any award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.