Case 1804649/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Gordon Keighley v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804649/2019
- Decision date
- 12 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson
- Venue
- Hull Tribunal
- Panel members
- Mrs S Scott, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Gordon Keighley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was summarily dismissed after the respondent concluded that he had behaved aggressively and inappropriately towards a colleague at a handover meeting, used a grievance as a threat towards that colleague, and made homophobic comments about that colleague. The tribunal found that the respondent carried out a reasonable investigation, including interviews with relevant witnesses, disciplinary and appeal processes, and further investigation where points were raised by the claimant.
On disability, the claimant relied principally on anxiety and depression, and at the hearing also referred to sleep apnoea. The tribunal found that the claimant had not proved a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities at the material time, and that the respondent did not have actual or constructive knowledge of such effects. The discrimination arising from disability complaint therefore failed.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal found that the dismissing officer had a genuine belief, on reasonable grounds after reasonable investigation, that the claimant had committed the three acts of serious misconduct. It found that dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses, taking account of the claimant's senior role, the respondent's policies, his long service and prior record, and the respondent's assessment of the risk of repetition. The appeal was found to be thorough and not a rubber stamp, and the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was procedurally and substantively fair and dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint was discrimination arising from disability. The tribunal found the claimant had not proved that anxiety/depression or sleep apnoea amounted to disability at the material time, and dismissed the complaint. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Guidance relating to the Definition of Disability (2011)
- section 98(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Abernethy v Mott Hay and Anderson [1974] ICR 323
- Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones 1983 IRLR 439 EAT
- band of reasonable responses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.