Case 1804670/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Karsera v Emmandale Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804670/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Karsera
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal recorded that Emmandale Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr S Karsera’s wages and ordered payment of £360.66. The judgment also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £348.26 for that claim.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £252.46, described in the judgment as 3.5 days. No separate award components such as basic award, compensatory award, injury to feelings, or interest were set out in the text provided. The total of the awards in the judgment is £961.38.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £361 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £348.26. | Upheld | — | £348 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, quantified as 3.5 days, and awards £252.46. | Upheld | — | £252 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £961
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.