Case 1804689/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms S Younis (Solicitor) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1804689/2023
- Decision date
- 28 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Morgan Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge P Morgan, sitting alone at Leeds by CVP on 1 November 2023, considered Mrs J Lord's complaints against Solidus Crumlin Ltd. The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages due on 22 June 2023 contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and ordered payment of £24.86 gross.
The Tribunal also upheld two breach of contract complaints: one for failure to pay the contractual rate for 8.5 days' accrued but untaken annual leave on termination (£70.42 gross), and one for failure to pay notice pay in full (£3,878.26 gross, calculated on a gross basis to reflect likely taxation as Post Employment Notice Pay). A further complaint that the Respondent had failed to pay for an additional three days' accrued but untaken annual leave was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant a grand total of £3,973.54. Written reasons were not provided as reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages due on 22 June 2023 under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996; well-founded. | Upheld | — | £25 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract for failure to pay contractual rate for 8.5 days' accrued but untaken annual leave on termination; well-founded. | Upheld | — | £70 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint that the Respondent failed to pay for a further three days' accrued but untaken annual leave on termination; not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract for failure to pay notice pay in full; calculated using gross pay to reflect likely taxation as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £3,878 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,974
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.