Case 1804699/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Horn v Econ Engineering Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804699/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Horn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Cox recorded that in case numbers 1804699/2019 and 1804700/2019 the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claims. The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of breach of contract, unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages or working time issues.
The only substantive procedural outcome recorded is withdrawal under rule 52. No liability findings, compensation assessment, or other remedy determination appears in the judgment, and no lay members are listed. The judgment date is 22 January 2020.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Withdrawn by the claimant; the tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn by the claimant; the tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Withdrawn by the claimant; the tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Withdrawn by the claimant; the tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.