Case 1804748/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Gilpin v Kirby Malzeard Pre-School — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804748/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Gilpin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Hull by video on 25 October 2023 before Employment Judge Miller. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms K Dawson, a committee member. The written judgment records that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so.
On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The record does not set out any merits findings on the underlying dispute, and no monetary award is recorded. The judgment also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only states that "the claim" was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. It does not identify any separate pleaded cause of action in the written reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.