Case 1804756/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Johnson v Greenerways Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1804756/2023
- Decision date
- 2 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Johnson, was employed by Greenerways Ltd as a multiskilled joiner between 15 May 2023 and 4 August 2023. The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from his wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £4,617.50, described as the gross amount of the unauthorised deduction.
The tribunal also found that the respondent was liable to pay compensation for holiday accrued due but untaken as at 4 August 2023. It ordered payment of £574.85, described as the gross amount of the holiday pay due and owing. The total sum awarded was £5,192.35, payable on or before 12 February 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross amount deducted. | Upheld | — | £4,618 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent liable to pay compensation for holiday accrued due but untaken as of 4 August 2023 and ordered payment of the gross holiday pay due and owing. | Upheld | — | £575 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,192
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.