Case 1804776/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Limpert, Consultant (Employment Law Clinic (Employers) Limited) v Reach South Sheffield (a company limited by guarantee) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804776/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Limpert, Consultant (Employment Law Clinic (Employers) Limited)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Little sat at Sheffield on 17 February 2020 and gave judgment on 18 February 2020 in the case of Mr S Rundell v Reach South Sheffield (a company limited by guarantee). The tribunal found that there was no fundamental breach of the contract of employment.
On that basis, when the claimant resigned he was not constructively dismissed. The judgment therefore records that the complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal failed. No award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found there was no fundamental breach of the contract of employment, so the claimant was not constructively dismissed when he resigned. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | This complaint failed because the claimant was not constructively dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | This complaint failed because the claimant was not constructively dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.