Case 1804778/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Perry Respondent 1: Respondent 2: Respondent 3: Respondent 4 Respondent 5: Respondent 6: DWF Law LLP Mr David Scottow Mr Graham Dagnall Mr Alasdair Peacock Mr Adam Heather Mr Gregory Morris HELD by telephone v Mrs E Cooper, Solicitor (DWF Law LLP) CONSENT — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804778/2020
- Decision date
- 24 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Perry Respondent 1: Respondent 2: Respondent 3: Respondent 4 Respondent 5: Respondent 6: DWF Law LLP Mr David Scottow Mr Graham Dagnall Mr Alasdair Peacock Mr Adam Heather Mr Gregory Morris HELD by telephone
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis consent judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying employment claims. It recorded that respondents 2 to 6 were discharged from the proceedings by consent, and that the complaints directed at those individuals were dismissed.
The judgment further states that, for the avoidance of doubt, all complaints in the claim would proceed against DWF Law LLP only. No legal test, liability finding, or monetary remedy is set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | By consent, respondents 2 to 6 were discharged from the proceedings and the complaints directed at those individuals were dismissed. The judgment does not record a merits determination of the underlying complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.