Case 1804782/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Redshaw v McLean & Appleton (Holdings) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804782/2020
- Decision date
- 10 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Redshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr P Redshaw's claim for unfair dismissal against McLean & Appleton (Holdings) Limited. The extract does not record any other liability findings beyond that single upheld claim.
The tribunal stated that a Polkey reduction would apply to any compensatory award, meaning the Claimant's compensation for loss of earnings should be limited to 10 days' pay. It also directed that, if the parties required a remedy hearing, they should notify the tribunal within 28 days of the judgment being sent to the parties and provide their unavailable dates.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment upheld the unfair dismissal claim. It recorded that a Polkey reduction would apply to any compensatory award, limiting compensation for loss of earnings to 10 days' pay, and indicated that a remedy hearing could be listed if the parties requested one. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey reduction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.