Case 1804784/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Barraclough v Direct Valeting Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804784/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Barraclough
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 27 November 2019 Employment Judge Rostant struck out the claimant's claim against Direct Valeting Limited. The judgment records that, by letter dated 14 November 2019, the Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's letter of 23 October 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 8 January 2020 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.