Case 1804785/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Selby Holdings Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804785/2020
- Decision date
- 11 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was for unlawful deductions from wages brought by Mr A Griffiths against Selby Holdings Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claim documents were posted to the respondent's registered office and hotel on 20 August 2020, were returned marked as no longer at that address, and that on 2 September 2020 an Employment Judge directed that the claim appeared not to be defended and that a rule 21 judgment should be entered.
The tribunal said there was sufficient information on the file to determine the claimant's case where sums had been declared as paid to HMRC but had not in fact been paid to the claimant. The complaint of unlawful deductions from wages therefore succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,418.34. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge JM Wade on 11 September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered after the respondent did not defend the claim. The tribunal recorded that sums declared paid to HMRC had not in fact been paid to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £2,418 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,418
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.