Case 1804820/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Battensby v Multiclean Supplies Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804820/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Battensby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by telephone on 2 February 2021 before Employment Judge Parkin sitting alone. The claimant, Miss N Battensby, was in person and the respondent did not attend or present any response. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had been employed by Multiclean Supplies Ltd as a housekeeper at the Castle Inn, Spofforth, Harrogate from 22 November 2019 to 5 March 2020.
The tribunal was satisfied, on the material before it and in the absence of any grounds of resistance, that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant the initial two weeks' 'in hand' payment and her final two weeks' pay. It found that those unpaid sums amounted to £680 gross, calculated as £340 for two weeks in hand at 20 hours per week at £8.50 per hour and £340 for the final two weeks' work on the same basis. It therefore found unlawful deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £680 gross.
The claimant had also referred to an unpaid bonus, but the tribunal made no award in respect of that item. It found that no performance bonus had ever been paid, and that the suggested bonus was discretionary and tied to performance targets and KPIs that had never been declared to the claimant. The tribunal also noted that the claimant's tax rebate had subsequently been received from HMRC and was not part of the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. No ET3 response was presented. The tribunal accepted that the respondent failed to pay the claimant the initial two weeks' 'in hand' pay and her final two weeks' pay, totalling £680 gross. The tribunal made no award for bonus because it found no bonus had been paid and the claimed scheme appeared discretionary and linked to targets/KPIs not declared to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £680
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.