Case 1804820/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. S Ijzereef First v Swish A Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804820/2023
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. S Ijzereef First
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 30 October 2023, before Employment Judge Shepherd and with no appearance for the respondent, the tribunal found that Ms S Ijzereef First's claims for unauthorised deduction from wages, notice, and outstanding holiday pay were well-founded and succeeded.
The judgment ordered Swish A Ltd to pay £24,417.14 on the wages claim together with pension loss of £2,607.52. It also ordered £3,243.86 on the notice claim together with a 25% uplift said to be £253.41 for unreasonable breach of the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary procedures, and £3,243.86 for outstanding holiday pay.
The extracted figures do not reconcile exactly with the stated total amount of £31,535.55, so the amounts are recorded as they appear in the judgment text and the inconsistency is noted. No discrimination issues or other separate remedy heads are recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £24,417.14 together with pension loss of £2,607.52. | Upheld | — | £24,417 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered payment of £3,243.86 and stated an uplift of 25% for unreasonable breach of the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary procedures, quantified in the extracted text as £253.41. The monetary figures in the extracted text do not reconcile exactly with the stated total award. | Upheld | — | £3,244 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,244 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £31,536
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.