Case 1804830/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Kusar v Live Safe Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804830/2020
- Decision date
- 24 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Kusar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 24 February 2021, Employment Judge Buckley issued a judgment on withdrawal in Miss S Kusar v Live Safe Limited (in voluntary liquidation). The judgment records that the complaints of unlawful deductions, described as arrears and other payments, and the gender reassignment discrimination complaint were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.
The same judgment recorded that the claimant's remaining claims were direct age, race, sex and religion or belief discrimination; harassment related to age, race, sex and religion or belief; sexual harassment; and victimisation. Those remaining claims were not determined in this judgment and were listed to proceed to a final hearing on 26 May 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the complaints of unlawful deductions, described as arrears and other payments, were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Gender reassignment discrimination | The judgment records that the gender reassignment discrimination complaint was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Gender reassignment | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.