Case 1804837/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S J Payne v J L Drinks Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804837/2023
- Decision date
- 8 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S J Payne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Hull by video on 2 November 2023 before Employment Judge Miller, found that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period 10 May 2023 to 5 July 2023.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,846.16, described as the gross sum deducted. It noted that the claimant was responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum. No other claims, legal tests, or remedy components were identified in the written judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted for the period 10 May 2023 to 5 July 2023. | Upheld | — | £3,846 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,846
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.