Case 1804838/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Sidwell Regenerations Ltd (formerly Brit Sec Staff Services Ltd) In creditors’ voluntary liquidation. — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804838/2020
- Decision date
- 17 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because the proceedings had been posted to the respondent's place of business, no response was received by the return date, and there was sufficient information on the file to give judgment. The respondent had entered winding up/liquidation on 9 July 2020, and the judgment was to be sent to c/o the liquidator.
The claimant's complaint of entitlement to holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,750. The judgment also records that the claimant had the opportunity to join his new employer as a respondent to the claim but did not do so.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that the respondent was in creditors' voluntary liquidation from 9 July 2020, no response had been received by the return date, and there was sufficient information on the file to determine the claim. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.