Case 1804841/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Lindley & Others v Davymarkham Limited (in administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804841/2018
- Decision date
- 6 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Lindley & Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 21 July 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why their claims should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that the claimants had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 15 June 2021 and that their complaints were not being actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. This decision does not record any findings on the merits of the underlying complaints, and the extracted text does not identify the substantive legal claims beyond the collective strike-out order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The short judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action. It records a collective order that the claims were struck out after the claimants failed to comply with an order dated 15 June 2021 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter of 21 July 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.