Case 1804847/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804847/2019
- Decision date
- 27 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Hull, before Employment Judge Davies sitting alone, heard the case on 26 and 27 October 2020. It recorded that Mr G Beney brought claims of unfair dismissal and breach of contract in respect of notice pay against Kingstown Works Limited.
In the judgment dated 27 October 2020, the tribunal found that both claims were not well-founded and dismissed them. No separate remedy award was made, and the written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings or cite any legal tests in the written record provided. On the face of the decision, the result is simply dismissal of both the unfair dismissal and notice pay claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was for notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.