Case 1804847/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Michael Garratt-Brady v Star Holdings (Humber) Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804847/2021
- Decision date
- 20 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Michael Garratt-Brady
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Buckley on 20 January 2022, recorded that the claim for unlawful deduction from wages for the period 16 May to 28 June 2021 succeeded. It ordered Star Holdings (Humber) Ltd (In Liquidation) to pay Mr Michael Garratt-Brady £1,482.66 net.
The remaining claims were not determined on their merits. The claim for unpaid notice pay was dismissed on withdrawal, as were the claims for unpaid holiday pay and for a redundancy payment. The judgment also states that the recoupment regulations do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unlawful deduction from wages for the period 16 May to 28 June 2021 succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,482.66 net. | Upheld | — | £1,483 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid notice pay dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,483
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.