Case 1804851/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr I Martin (HR business partner) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804851/2021
- Decision date
- 17 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Horsfield, brought claims for unauthorised deduction from wages and holiday pay against Tuffnells Parcels Express Ltd. Employment Judge Davies heard the case by CVP on 12 November 2021, with the claimant appearing in person and Mr I Martin appearing for the respondent as HR business partner.
The tribunal found that both the unauthorised deduction from wages claim and the holiday pay claim were not well-founded. Both claims were dismissed. No compensation or other award was made to the claimant in respect of those claims.
The respondent's application for a preparation time order succeeded. The claimant was ordered to pay the respondent £119.70 towards its preparation time, with the parties to discuss arrangements for payment by instalments.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £120
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.