Case 1804852/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v DSLLS Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804852/2022
- Decision date
- 22 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Hennigan was employed by DSLLS Limited from 4 March 2018 and was made redundant on 17 August 2021. The tribunal found that she did not apply for a redundancy payment within the first six months after the relevant date, but she later contacted the first respondent's financial director and then the provisional liquidators, Wilson Field, who told her matters were being sorted and that she would be paid when the company went into liquidation.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant did not know she could make a tribunal claim and did not take independent advice during the relevant period. It found that she relied on information from the first respondent and the provisional liquidators, who did not tell her about the time limit. Her written application on 20 June 2022 was accepted as a claim within s.164(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996.
Applying s.164(2), the tribunal held that it was just and equitable to allow the claim notwithstanding that it was made about 10 months after the effective date of termination. It awarded a redundancy payment calculated using the gross weekly pay of £470.51, three years' service, and the statutory formula of 1.5, producing a total award of £2,117.30.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal treated the claimant's notice to Wilson Field on 20 June 2022 as a written claim under s.164(2)(a) ERA 1996 and held it just and equitable to award a redundancy payment outside the first six-month period. | Upheld | — | £2,117 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,117
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.164(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.