Case 1804861/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Holden v Grays (Fish and Chips Halifax) At: Leeds via CVP (video link) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804861/2021
- Decision date
- 13 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cronin JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Holden
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Cronin considered the ET1 and decided that the claim could properly be determined without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs C Holden’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,194.00 gross.
No other claim or heads of remedy were recorded in the judgment, and the award was stated as a single gross sum rather than broken into separate components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. The tribunal considered the ET1 and determined that the claim could properly be decided without a hearing. | Upheld | — | £1,194 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,194
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.