Case 1804869/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Prior v Clarico Payroll Services Limited Heard by CVP on 6 April 2022 — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804869/2021
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Prior
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard by CVP on 6 April 2022 before Employment Judge D N Jones, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not in attendance. The tribunal made three monetary awards in the claimant’s favour.
First, it found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered repayment of £822 net. Second, it held that the respondent had failed to pay holiday pay in respect of untaken leave outstanding at the termination of employment and ordered payment of £803.33 gross for that entitlement.
Third, the tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant’s contract of employment by failing to give notice of termination. It awarded damages of £1,004.18, described in the judgment as 2 weeks of gross pay. The total monetary award was therefore £2,629.51.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in the sum of £822 net. | Upheld | — | £822 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday pay in respect of untaken leave outstanding at termination and ordered £803.33 gross. | Upheld | — | £803 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the contract by failing to give notice on termination and awarded £1,004.18, described as 2 weeks of gross pay. | Upheld | — | £1,004 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,630
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.