Case 1804874/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Mahmood v Plusnet plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804874/2019
- Decision date
- 9 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Mahmood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made on withdrawal under rule 52. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's deductions from wages or breach of contract complaint concerning other payments due was dismissed following withdrawal of that claim by the claimant.
The judgment did not determine the disability discrimination claim. It recorded that the disability discrimination claim would proceed to hearing unless otherwise disposed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's deductions from wages or breach of contract complaint concerning other payments due was dismissed following withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The wording refers to a deductions from wages or breach of contract complaint; classification as a separate breach of contract claim is based on that alternative wording. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim proceeds to hearing unless otherwise disposed; it was not adjudicated in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.