Case 1804879/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Taylor v Monarch Art Stone Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804879/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a strike out decision. By a letter dated 14 December 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr C Taylor an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 25 August 2020 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Taylor did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Maidment ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not identify any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim(s), and it records no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause(s) of action; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.