Case 1804890/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Taylor and Mr M Mars v Queen Ethelburga’s College Limited Heard: Remotely (by video link) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1804890/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Taylor and Mr M Mars
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was a remote video hearing before Employment Judge S Shore on 10 February 2021. The judgment records that Mr P Taylor and Mr M Mars brought breach of contract claims against Queen Ethelburga’s College Limited, identified in the judgment as claims for non-payment of notice pay.
The tribunal held that the breach of contract claims had no reasonable prospect of success and struck them out in their entireties. No substantive liability finding or remedy award was made. The judgment also records the respondent's correct name as Queen Ethelburga’s College Limited.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the claimants' breach of contract claims, which were pleaded as non-payment of notice pay, on the basis that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The order states that both claims were struck out in their entireties. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.